|
|
Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
Blood, Vol. 92 No. 3 (August 1), 1998:
pp. 756-764
RAPID COMMUNICATION
The -Chemokine Receptor CXCR4 Is Expressed on the
Megakaryocytic Lineage From Progenitor to Platelets and Modulates
Migration and Adhesion
By
Jian-Feng Wang,
Zhong-Ying Liu, and
Jerome E. Groopman
From the Divisions of Experimental Medicine and Hematology/Oncology,
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston,
MA.
 |
ABSTRACT |
CXCR4 is the receptor for the -chemokine stromal cell-derived
factor 1 (SDF-1) and has been shown to be expressed on a diversity of
leukocytes. In this report, the expression of the CXCR4 receptor in
cells of megakaryocytic lineage and the role of SDF-1 in
megakaryocytopoiesis were investigated. Using flow cytometry in
combination with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction
(RT-PCR), we observed that bone marrow CD34+,
CD61+ cells, blood platelets, and megakaryocytic leukemia
cell lines all expressed the CXCR4 receptor. To examine the expression
of the CXCR4 receptor on megakaryocyte progenitors (colony-forming units-megakaryocyte [CFU-Meg]), CXCR4-positive and
-negative CD34+ populations were separated from bone
marrow and cultured in a plasma clot culture system. A subpopulation of
the CFU-Meg was found in the CXCR4-positive fraction. The functional
significance of CXCR4 expression on cells of the megakaryocytic lineage
was examined by studying the effects of SDF-1 on migration and
proliferation of megakaryocyte progenitor cells in vitro. We found that
SDF-1 potently induced megakaryocyte progenitor migration and
significantly enhanced adhesion of mature marrow megakaryocytes
to endothelium. No marked effects of SDF-1 alone or in combination
with thrombopoietin and stem cell factor/kit ligand on megakaryocyte
production in vitro were noted. These results demonstrate for the first
time that the CXCR4 -chemokine receptor is expressed on cells of the megakaryocytic lineage from progenitors to platelets and that its
ligand SDF-1 may modulate several aspects of megakaryocytopoiesis.
© 1998 by The American Society of Hematology.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
CHEMOKINES ARE A family of relatively low
molecular weight proteins that mediate cell migration. Their
classification is based on the sequence of arranged cysteine groups,
with four subsets of chemokines reported to date. The subset is
characterized by an intervening amino acid between two cysteines and is
thus termed CXC chemokines.1,2
The receptors for chemokines are seven transmembrane structures that
are linked to G-proteins and mediate calcium flux upon activation.3,4 The surface expression of different
chemokine receptors and the biological functions of their cognate
ligands have largely been studied on leukocytes.5-10 The
-chemokine receptor CXCR4 has been shown to be abundantly expressed
in a diversity of white blood cells, including peripheral blood
lymphocytes, monocytes,11-15 thymocytes,16
pre-B cells,17 and dendritic cells.18,19
Stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1), the natural ligand for CXCR4,
was initially cloned from bone marrow stroma.20,21 It has
been characterized as a pre-B-cell stimulating factor (PBSF) as well as a potent chemoattractant for T lymphocytes,
monocytes,11-15 and pre-B cells.17 Targeted
disruption of the SDF-1 gene in mice was shown to be lethal with severe
abnormalities in B-cell lymphopoiesis and bone marrow
myelopoiesis.22 Recently, CXCR4 was identified as a
coreceptor for the entry of T-tropic human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV), and SDF-1 has been shown to inhibit T-tropic HIV
infection.14,15 SDF-1 was recently observed to potently
mediate chemotaxis of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor
cells.23 This observation indicates that
SDF-1/CXCR4 may play a role in other aspects of
hematopoiesis.
The expression of the CXCR4 receptor on megakaryocytic cells and the
potential functions of its ligand, SDF-1, in such cells have
not been addressed. No data exist to our knowledge about megakaryocytopoiesis in SDF-1 knockout mice. To that end, we have examined bone marrow megakaryocyte progenitors (colony-forming units-megakaryocyte [CFU-Meg]), mature bone marrow
megakaryocytes, and blood platelets for CXCR4 expression. We
have studied the effects of SDF-1 on modulating in vitro
megakaryocytopoiesis in response to known lineage growth factors,
on effecting megakaryocyte progenitor migration, and on altering
adhesive properties of marrow megakaryocytes to endothelium. Our
results suggest that SDF-1 is a novel cytokine that may regulate
megakaryocytopoiesis through multiple functional activities.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Preparation of human bone marrow cells.
Light-density bone marrow mononuclear cells were obtained from normal
consenting donors and depleted of adherent cells as previously
described.24
Isolation of CD34+ bone marrow cells by
immunoadsorption.
CD34+ cells were isolated by immunoadsorption using the
CellPro (Bothell, WA) Ceprate LC system according to the
manufacturer's instructions. After elution, cells were washed with
Ca2+ Mg2+-free phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and resuspended in the appropriate
medium for the migration assay or in the appropriate medium for
megakaryocyte liquid culture (see below). The purity of the
CD34+ cell-enriched fraction ranged between 90% and 95%.
Cell separation or isolation by immunomagnetic beads.
Nonadherent light-density bone marrow cells or cultured bone marrow
cells were washed with and resuspended in ice-cold PBS with 10% fetal
calf serum (FCS) and 0.5% BSA (isolation medium). For megakaryocyte
isolation, an isolation medium (megakaryocyte medium25),
which consisted of Ca2+ Mg2+-free PBS
containing 13.6 mmol/L sodium citrate, 1 mmol/L theophylline, 1% BSA
(fraction V), and 11 mmol/L glucose (Sigma Chemical Co, St Louis, MO),
adjusted to pH 7.3 and an osmolarity of 290 mOsmol/L, was used. The
cells were incubated for 20 minutes at 4°C and then incubated with
monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs; anti-CD34 [Immunotech, Westbrook, ME],
anti-CD61 [Dako, Carpinteria, CA], or anti-CXCR4 [12G5]
[PharMingen, San Diego, CA]) at 2 µg/106 cells for 1 hour at 4°C. The cells were washed with PBS twice and incubated
with magnetic beads coated with sheep antimouse IgG (Dynabeads M-450;
Dynal Inc, Lake Success, NY) for 30 minutes at 4°C. Positive or
negative cells were separated by washing four times with isolation
medium. In some experiments, CD34+ cells were selected by
the Dynal CD34 Progenitor Cell Selection system (Dynalbeads M-450 CD34
and DETACHaBEAD CD34; Dynal) to detach the beads binding on the cells
and to remove antibody and beads from the cells. The purity of the
CD34+ cells isolated by this method ranged between 90% and
95%.
Platelet preparation.
Human platelets were isolated from blood freshly drawn from healthy
volunteers and anticoagulated with 0.1 vol of 3.8% sodium citrate, as
described previously.26
Culture of megakaryocytic cell lines and human umbilical vein
endothelial cells (HUVECs).
The permanent human megakaryocytic cell lines HEL and UT-7 were
obtained from the American Type Tissue Culture Collection (Bethesda,
MD). Other megakaryocyte cell lines studied were generous gifts to our
laboratory. The CMK cell line was provided by Dr T. Sato (Chiba
University, Chiba, Japan), the Dami cell line by Dr S. Greenberg
(Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA),
and the Mo7E cell line by Dr J. Hoxie (University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, PA). The murine pre-B-cell line L1.2 transfected with
CXCR4 vector was obtained from LeukoSite, Inc (Cambridge,
MA). HEL, CMK, and Dami cell lines were cultured in
RPMI-1640 medium with 10% FCS. The growth factor-dependent cell line, UT-7, was maintained with 10 ng/mL of interleukin-3 (IL-3)
in RPMI-1640 medium with 10% FCS, and Mo7E was cultured with 10 ng/mL
IL-3 in RPMI-1640 medium with 20% FCS. HUVECs were obtained from
Clonetics Corp (San Diego, CA) and were maintained in endothelial cell
growth medium (EGM), which contained 10 ng/mL epidermal growth factor,
1 µg/mL hydrocortisone, 12 µg/mL bovine brain extract, 1.6 U/mL
heparin, and 2% fetal bovine serum (Clonetics). Third through fifth
passages of HUVECs were used for all experiments.
Antibodies and flow cytometric analysis.
Cells collected from human bone marrow or liquid culture were washed
with ice-cold megakaryocyte medium with 2.5% FCS and then resuspended
at 106/100 µL. The cells were incubated with purified
normal mouse IgG (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA), 2 µg/106 cells at 4°C for 20 minutes to block any
possible nonspecific binding. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)- or
phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated MoAbs or control isotype antibodies were
then incubated with the cells at 4°C for 40 minutes. After
extensive washing, cells were resuspended in 1% paraformaldehyde in
PBS at 4°C in the dark. Cell-associated immunofluorescence was
analyzed by a FACscan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA)
using CellQuest software. Several MoAbs were used for flow cytometry:
FITC-conjugated anti-CD34, FITC-conjugated anti-IIIa (CD61),
PE-conjugated anti-CXCR4 (12G5); the corresponding control isotype
antibodies were purchased from Coulter (Miami, FL), Dako, and
PharMingen, respectively.
CFU-Meg culture.
To assay for human CFU-Meg, the plasma clot culture system was used.
The culture medium consisted of 280 µg/mL CaCl2, 10 mmol/L -TG (Sigma), and 20 µg/mL L-asparagine constituted in
complete -medium ( -medium supplemented with 1 mmol/L minimum
essential medium [MEM] sodium pyruvate, 0.05 mmol/L MEM
nonessential amino acids, 1× MEM amino acids, 5 × 10 5 mol/L of -mercaptoethanol, and 50 µg/mL
penicillin and 50 µg/mL streptomycin; GIBCO Laboratories, Grand
Island, NY) and 15% platelet-poor plasma (PPP). Thrombopoietin (TPO)
at 50 ng/mL (a generous gift from Genentech, South San Francisco, CA)
and 100 ng/mL stem cell factor (SCF; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA) were
used as megakaryocyte growth factors. Cultures were
incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 12 days. Quantitation
of colonies was performed by immunofluorescent staining using
anti-GpIIIa MoAb and each cluster of three or more megakaryocytes was
scored as a colony as read under a fluorescent microscope.
Liquid culture for megakaryocytes.
Isolated bone marrow CD34+ cells were plated in 96 flat-bottomed multiwell plates in growth factor-free and serum-free
medium optimized for megakaryocyte cell culture (MegaCult, Serum-free "Base" Medium; StemCell Technologies Inc, Vancouver, British
Columbia, Canada). Cells then were cultured for 10 days with various
growth factors and assessed for megakaryocyte production. The number of
megakaryocytes produced was determined by immunofluorescence staining
using anti-CD61 MoAb and cell counting.
Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis
for CXCR4 gene expression.
Total RNA was extracted from cells using the RNA isolation system
ULTRASPEC-II (Biotecx Laboratories, Inc, Houston, TX). One microgram of
total RNA was denatured by heating and reverse transcribed with 20 U
Moloney murine leukemia virus (MMLV) RT into first-strand cDNA using 30 pmol of primers (dt). The reaction was performed for 1 hour at 37°C
in a 20 µL final volume containing 5 mmol/L dithiothreitol
(DTT), 40 U RNAsin, 5 mmol/L dNTP mixture, and 5×
buffer (200 mmol/L Tris, pH 8.3, 40 µmol/L MgCl2). PCR
was performed in a DNA thermal cycler (Perkin-Elmer Cetus Corp,
Norwalk, CT) using 5 µL of the transcription mixture and 2.5 U of Taq
polymerase. dNTPs (0.2 mmol/L), 10× reaction buffer (100 mmol/L
Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mmol/L KCl, 15 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.01%
gelatin) and 30 pmol of each primer were added in a 50 µL reaction
volume for 30 cycles at 94°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 30 seconds. The following specific oligomers
were used for CXCR4 detection: 5 -AGC TGT TGG CTG AAA AGC TGG TCT
ATG-3 and 5 -GCG CTT CTG GTG GCC CTT GGA GTG TG-3 .
Chemotaxis assays.
Chemotaxis assays were performed in triplicate using 5-µm pore
filters (Transwell, 24-well cell clusters; Costar, Boston, MA). The
filters were rinsed with migration medium (complete -medium with
0.5% BSA) and the supernatant was aspirated immediately before loading
cells. CD34+ cells (1.5 × 105) suspended
in 100 µL migration medium with or without various concentrations of
SDF-1 (R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) were loaded into each
Transwell filter (upper well). Filters were then carefully transferred
to another well (lower well) containing 650 µL migration medium
consisting of different concentrations of SDF-1 . The plates were
incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 3.5 hours. Next, the
upper wells were carefully removed and the cells in the lower wells
were collected. The cells were washed and resuspended in proper volume
and quantitated for viable cells using trypan blue exclusion. The
number of CFU-Meg in the migrated CD34+ cell population was
assessed by culturing the migrated cells in the plasma clot culture
system described above.
Adhesion assay.
CD34+ cell-derived megakaryocytes were used in an
endothelial adhesion assay. CD34+ cells first were cultured
in a liquid culture system using serum-free MegaCult Serum-free
"Base" Medium (StemCells Technology, Inc) with 50 ng/mL TPO and
100 ng/mL SCF for 10 days. Megakaryocytes then were
isolated by magnetic beads using anti-GpIIIa MoAb from this culture and
the cells were washed three times in megakaryocytic medium. The cells
were subsequently incubated in growth factor-free Meg medium at 5 × 105/mL with 10 µCi of 51Cr
carrier-free (DuPont NEN, Boston, MA) at 37°C overnight. The cells
were washed three times and resuspended in Meg medium at 105/mL before treatments with different concentrations of
SDF-1 for 6 hours at 37°C. After treatments, the cells were
washed and resuspended at 2.5 × 104/100 µL in
modified HEPES-Tyrode's buffer supplemented with 1% BSA, 2 mmol/L
CaCl2, and 1 mmol/L MgCl2, as reported
previously.27 The cell suspension was applied
onto a confluent HUVEC monolayer in 96-well plates and incubated for 1 hour at 37°C. Nonadherent cells were removed by washing four times.
Quantitation of adherent cells per well was performed by liquid
scintillation counting for 51Cr.
Statistical analysis.
The results are expressed as the mean ± SD of data obtained from
three or more experiments performed in duplicate or triplicate. Statistical significance was determined using the Student's
t-test.
 |
RESULTS |
CXCR4 gene expression in megakaryocytes and platelets.
To detect the expression of the CXCR4 receptor, RT-PCR was performed
using specific primers as described in Materials and Methods. In these
experiments, mRNA isolated from L1.2 cells transfected with a human
CXCR4-expressing vector was used as a positive control; RT-PCR
performed without RNA was used as a negative control.
The CXCR4 transcripts were specifically amplified at their expected
size (250 bp) in isolated bone marrow megakaryocytes and CD34+ progenitor cells. Platelets isolated from peripheral
blood as well as the megakaryocytic leukemia cell lines HEL, CMK, Dami, Mo7E, and UT-7 were also found to express CXCR4 mRNA by RT-PCR (Fig 1).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 1.
CXCR4 gene expression in normal bone marrow
CD34+ cells, megakaryocytes, platelets, and
megakaryocytic cell lines. RT-PCR was performed as described in
Materials and Methods. The PCR products were electrophoresed on a 3%
agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. RNA isolated
from CXCR4-transfected L1.2 cells was used as a positive control and
RT-PCR without RNA was used as a negative control. Lanes 1 through 11 represent negative control, CD34+ cells,
CD61+ cells, platelets, HEL, CMK, Dami, Mo7E, UT-7,
positive control, and DNA marker, respectively.
|
|
Cell surface expression of the CXCR4 receptor on megakaryocytes and
platelets.
The cell surface expression of the CXCR4 receptor was analyzed by flow
cytometry. About 46.9 ± 20.7% (n = 9) of nonadherent bone marrow
mononuclear cells expressed this protein. To detect CXCR4 expression on
CD34+ cells or megakaryocytes, two-color immunofluorescence
staining was performed using PE-conjugated anti-CXCR4 MoAb (12G5) with FITC-conjugated anti-CD34 or anti-CD61 MoAb as described in Materials and Methods. Flow cytometry analysis showed that CXCR4 was coexpressed with CD34 as well as CD61. The percentage of expression of CXCR4 with
CD34 or CD61 was found to be different from donor to donor. The
coexpression of CXCR4 with CD34 ranged from 13% to 93%, with an
average of 60.6% ± 25.8%. The coexpression of CXCR4 with CD61 ranged from 13% to 89%, with an average of 61.2% ± 26.7%. One representative experiment is shown in Fig
2. These data indicate that the CXCR4 receptor was expressed on cells
of the megakaryocytic lineage.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 2.
Two-color flow cytometry analysis of the cell surface
expression of the CXCR4 receptor on bone marrow CD34+
cells and megakaryocytes. Nonadherent light-density bone marrow cells
were labeled simultaneously with a PE-conjugated anti-CXCR4 MoAb (12G5)
and either an FITC-conjugated anti-CD34 (left panel) or anti-CD61
(right panel) MoAb. Double staining with PE- or FITC-labeled normal
isotype mouse IgG was used as the negative control (data not shown).
The figure in each quadrant represents the percentage of cells.
|
|
To confirm the expression of the CXCR4 receptor on megakaryocytes,
CD34+ cells were cultured in liquid medium in the presence
of TPO and SCF to obtain a population highly enriched in megakaryocytes
(up to 50%). Cells were dually labeled with an FITC-conjugated
anti-GpIIIa MoAb and a PE-conjugated anti-CXCR4 MoAb. Staining was
analyzed by flow cytometry. Most of the GpIIIa-positive cells were
stained by anti-CXCR4 antibody, whereas almost all (>90%) of the
CXCR4-positive cells were shown to be GpIIIa-positive. Further analysis
was performed by selectively gating the cells with different light
scatter properties. As shown in Fig 3,
megakaryocytes with large forward and side scatter properties (R2),
which correspond to megakaryocytes of larger size and higher ploidy
levels, as described previously,28 exhibited the stronger
staining for CXCR4 than megakaryocytes with a relatively small size
(R1).

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 3.
Expression of the CXCR4 receptor on CD34+
cell-derived megakaryocytes by flow cytometry. CD34+
cells were cultured in a serum-free liquid culture system in the
presence of TPO and SCF for 12 days. Cultured cells were stained with a
PE-conjugated anti-CXCR4 MoAb (12G5) and either an FITC-conjugated anti-CD61 MoAb or an isotype control IgG and analyzed on FACscan. (A)
The side scatter (SSC) versus forward scatter (FSC) of the analyzed
cells. R1 represents the gating of the cells with relatively smaller
forward and side scatter properties (which correspond to megakaryocytes
with lower ploidy level and smaller size); R2 represents the gating of
the cells with relatively larger forward and side scatter properties
(which correspond to megakaryocytes with higher ploidy level and larger
size). (B) and (D) show the coexpression of CXCR4 with CD61 shown in
the dot plot as analyzed with gating in R1 and R2, respectively. The
figures in these two quadrants represent the percentage of the
double-positive cells. (C) and (E) show the expression of CXCR4 shown
in the histogram plot as analyzed with gating in R1 and R2,
respectively. The staining with control antibody is shown as the solid
profile and the staining with the anti-CXCR4 antibody is shown as the
thin line. The percentage of positive expression is provided in the
inset. MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.
|
|
The expression of the CXCR4 receptor on platelets freshly isolated from
peripheral blood was also detected by FACS analysis (Fig 4).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 4.
Expression of the CXCR4 receptor on peripheral blood
platelets. Platelets were prepared as described in Materials and
Methods. Platelets were stained with a PE-conjugated anti-CXCR4 MoAb or isotype control antibody and then analyzed by flow cytometry. The
staining with control antibody is shown as the solid profile and the
staining with the anti-CXCR4 antibody is shown as the thin line.
|
|
Expression of the CXCR4 receptor on megakaryocytic leukemia cell
lines.
Cells from the megakaryocytic leukemia cell lines CMK, Dami, HEL, Mo7E,
and UT-7 were stained with PE-conjugated anti-CXCR4 MoAb (12G5) and
analyzed by flow cytometry. As shown in Fig
5, a relatively lower surface expression of CXCR4 was found on
megakaryocytic cell lines as compared with primary bone marrow
megakaryocytes and platelets. Similar to the results observed with
normal megakaryocytes, the expression of the CXCR4 receptor on
megakaryocytic leukemia cells varied according to their maturation
stage, with higher expression found in more mature megakaryocytic cells
(data not shown).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 5.
Expression of the CXCR4 receptor on megakaryocytic
leukemia cell lines. Cells were stained with a PE-conjugated anti-CXCR4 MoAb or isotype control antibody and then analyzed by flow cytometry. The staining with control antibody is shown as the solid profile and
the staining with the anti-CXCR4 antibody is shown as the thin line.
The percentage of positive expression is provided in the inset. MFI,
mean fluorescence intensity.
|
|
Expression of the CXCR4 receptor on megakaryocytic progenitor cells.
To address whether the CXCR4 receptor is expressed on megakaryocyte
progenitors, CXCR4-positive and -negative populations were separated
from bone marrow by magnetic beads using the specific anti-CXCR4 MoAb.
About 85.6% ± 6.4% of the total cell population were recovered
after selection. We obtained 35.3% ± 6.1% of the recovered cells
in the CXCR4-positive fraction.
After selection, CXCR4-positive or -negative bone marrow cells were
cultured in a plasma clot culture system for CFU-Meg in the presence of
TPO and SCF. We observed a 1.4-fold enrichment of CFU-Meg in the cells
selected for CXCR4 expression compared with that in unseparated cells.
The frequency of CFU-Meg (the number of colonies formed per number of
cells plated) in the CXCR4-positive fraction was about 3 times higher
than in the CXCR4-negative fraction (Fig
6). There were no significant differences in the size or morphology of
the CFU-Meg colonies formed by CXCR4-positive or -negative bone marrow
cells, as observed by microscopy. After selection by this method,
approximately 72.4% ± 10.5% of the total CFU-Meg were recovered
and 53.9% ± 10.6% of them were found in the CXCR4-positive
fraction. These results indicate that the CXCR4 receptor is expressed
on a subpopulation of megakaryocytic progenitor cells.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 6.
Megakaryocyte colony formation from the CXCR4-positive or
-negative fraction of bone marrow cells separated by immunomagnetic bead isolation. Nonadherent light-density bone marrow cells were separated by immunomagnetic bead isolation as described in Materials and Methods and then cultured in the plasma clot system for CFU-Meg. The number of megakaryocyte colonies was determined after 12 days of
culture. Results represent the mean ± SD of three separate experiments performed in triplicate. * and ** show statistical significance compared with unseparated control and are assessed as
P < .05 and P < .01, respectively.
|
|
The effects of the SDF-1 ligand for the CXCR4 receptor on
migration of megakaryocytic progenitor cells.
SDF-1 has been shown to be a chemoattractant for CD34+
hematopoietic progenitor cells.23 The observed expression
of the CXCR4 receptor on megakaryocytic progenitors led us to examine
if SDF-1 had any effects on the migration of cells of this lineage. To address this question, CD34+ cells were isolated from bone
marrow by an immunoaffinity column and studied in a chemotaxis assay.
The migrated CD34+ cells were collected and cultured in the
plasma clot system for CFU-Meg.
As shown in Fig 7, CFU-Meg as well as
CD34+ cells migrated in response to SDF-1 in a
dose-dependent manner.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 7.
Modulation of migration of CD34+ cells and
megakaryocytic progenitor cells by SDF-1 . CD34+ cells
were isolated from bone marrow by immunoadsorption using the CellPro
Ceprate LC system. Migration of isolated CD34+ cells and
CFU-Meg was measured as described in Materials and Methods. The
migration of CD34+ cells or CFU-Meg was shown as the
percentage of cell input. Results represent the mean ± SD of four
separate experiments. * and ** show statistical significance compared
with control and are assessed as P < .05 and
P < .01, respectively.
|
|
Cell migration induced by chemokines or cytokines has been considered
to be by two different mechanisms: chemotaxis and chemokinesis. Chemotaxis is the attraction of cells only in a positive concentration gradient, whereas chemokinesis is inducing cell migration in a random
direction by activating cell motility.29,30 To confirm the
chemotaxic effects of SDF-1 on CD34+ or CFU-Meg,
migration assays were performed by adding different concentrations (0 to 300 ng/mL) of SDF-1 in the upper well, with 300 ng/mL of SDF-1
in the lower well. As shown in Fig 8,
addition of SDF-1 in upper well significantly inhibited the
migration of CD34+ or CFU-Meg response to SDF-1 in lower
well.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 8.
Inhibitory effect of SDF-1 in the upper well on the
migration of CD34+ cells, or CFU-Meg in response to
SDF-1 in the lower well. CD34+ cells were loaded into
the upper well with 0 to 300 ng/mL of SDF-1 and then applied to the
lower well containing medium with or without 300 ng/mL of SDF-1 for
migration assays. The migrated CD34+ cells were collected
and counted. The number of CFU-Meg in the migrated CD34+
cell population was assessed by culturing the migrated cells in the
plasma clot culture system as described in Materials and Methods. The
migration of the CD34+ cells or CFU-Meg was shown as the
percentage of cell input. Results represent the mean ± SD of three
separate experiments. * and ** show statistical significance compared
with control (with 300 ng/mL of SDF-1 in the lower well and no
SDF-1 in the upper well) and are assessed as P < .05 and
P < .01, respectively.
|
|
These results indicated that SDF-1 is a chemoattractant factor for
megakaryocytic progenitor cells.
The effects of SDF-1 on the production of
megakaryocytes from CD34+ cells in vitro.
SDF-1 has been shown to be involved in B-cell lymphopoiesis and
myelopoiesis.20-22 We therefore asked whether SDF-1
modulated the production of mature GpIIb/IIIa+
megakaryocytes from CD34+ progenitor cells.
As shown in Fig 9, SDF-1 alone had no
significant effect on megakaryocyte production under serum-free liquid
culture conditions. However, SDF-1 modestly promoted megakaryocyte
production when combined with TPO. SDF-1 at 10 to 100 ng/mL
increased megakaryocyte production by about 30% to 40% in combination
with this growth factor. No significant increase in
megakaryocyte production was observed when SDF-1 was combined with
TPO + SCF under these culture conditions.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 9.
Effects of SDF-1 on the production of
megakaryocytes from CD34+ cells. CD34+
cells were isolated from bone marrow by immunoadsorption using the
CellPro Ceprate LC system as described in Materials and Methods. The
cells were cultured in a liquid culture using serum-free medium with
growth factors as indicated. After 10 days of culture, megakaryocyte production was assessed by immunofluorescence staining using an anti-CD61 MoAb and cell counting. Results represent the mean ± SD of
three separate experiments. * shows statistical significance compared
with the control without SDF-1 and is assessed as P < .05.
|
|
SDF-1 promotes the adhesion of megakaryocytes to endothelial
cells.
The endothelial cell is one of the major components of the
hematopoietic microenvironment.31,32 HUVECs have been used
as a cell model to study the interaction of megakaryocytes with
endothelium.33 Previous studies have shown that SDF-1
induces hematopoietic progenitor cell migration on an endothelial
monolayer.23 Because mature megakaryocytes express high
levels of CXCR4 receptor, we asked if SDF-1 modulated the interaction
of such megakaryocytes with endothelial cells. Adhesion assays were
performed using CD34+ cell-derived megakaryocytes and
confluent HUVECs as described in Materials and Methods. We observed
that SDF-1 significantly increased the adhesion of megakaryocytes on
HUVEC monolayer at a higher concentration (1,000 ng/mL;
Fig 10).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
| Fig 10.
Modulation of the adhesion of megakaryocytes to HUVEC by
SDF-1 treatment. 51Cr-labeled megakaryocytes were
treated with SDF-1 at the indicated concentrations for 6 hours
before plating onto a HUVEC monolayer for the adhesion assay, as
described in Materials and Methods. The adherent cells were determined
by measuring the cpm value. The data are representative of three
independent experiments performed in triplicate. * and ** show
statistical significance compared with control and are assessed as
P < .05 and P < .01, respectively.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we investigated the expression and functions of the
CXCR4 receptor on cells of the megakaryocytic lineage.
Megakaryocytes freshly isolated from normal human bone marrow were
shown to express CXCR4 as analyzed by both RT-PCR and flow cytometry.
CD34+ cell-derived, highly enriched megakaryocyte
populations allowed us to obtain enough cell numbers for more detailed
analysis. The degree of expression of CXCR4 was found to increase in
parallel with the stage of megakaryocyte maturation. In agreement with this observation, CXCR4 was detected at robust levels on platelets both
by RT-PCR and flow cytometry.
The cell surface expression of the CXCR4 receptor on megakaryocytic
leukemia cell lines appeared lower than on normal cells. Similar to the
results with normal megakaryocytes, higher levels of expression were
found on the cells of larger size and higher ploidy levels as analyzed
by flow cytometry.
Our data indicate that CXCR4 is expressed on all cells of the
megakaryocytic lineage, from progenitors (CFU-Meg) to peripheral blood
platelets. The level of expression as detected by flow cytometry increased with increased maturational stage and was nearly uniform on
terminally differentiated circulating platelets. This observation suggests that CXCR4 likely mediates different cell functions at the
different maturational stages, given the marked differences in
biological roles between the extremes of CFU-Meg and, at the other end,
circulating platelets.
Indeed, we observed a marked potentiating effect of SDF-1 on CFU-Meg
migration. This result is consistent with the previously reported
chemotactic effect of SDF-1 on a heterogeneous CD34+
population in vitro.23 These data indicate that SDF-1 may
play a role in modulating megakaryocytopoiesis by triggering the
trafficking and homing of megakaryocytic progenitors.
We then examined if SDF-1 can modulate the production of megakaryocytes
from their progenitors. Unlike other CXC or CC chemokines that have
been shown to inhibit the proliferation of megakaryocyte progenitor
cells34 as well as hematopoietic stem
cells,35-37 SDF-1 had no inhibitory effects on
megakaryocyte production from early progenitors in vitro. Instead, we
observed that SDF-1 modestly enhanced megakaryocyte production
(~30% to 40%) from CD34+ cells in the presence of TPO.
SDF-1 alone had no discernible effects on megakaryocyte production
(Fig 9).
To further address the effects of SDF-1 on megakaryocytopoiesis, we
studied the adhesive interactions of primary megakaryocytes with endothelium. We used primary HUVECs in these experiments as a
model system, because they have yielded useful insights in the past
with regard to effects of a variety of cytokines on megakaryocyte attachment.33 We observed that SDF-1 significantly
increased megakaryocyte adhesion to HUVECs. Because endothelium is
believed to be an important source for hematopoietic growth factors in the marrow cavity, as well as to provide a supporting matrix for maturing cells,31,32 our in vitro observations provide
further evidence for a potential role of SDF-1 in regulating human
megakaryocytopoiesis.
The finding of robust expression of CXCR4 on peripheral blood platelets
suggests that SDF-1 might alter platelet adhesion to endothelium or
otherwise modulate platelet functions. These possibilities are
currently being investigated.
In conclusion, our results demonstrate for the first time that the
CXCR4 -chemokine receptor is expressed on the megakaryocytic lineage
from progenitor to platelets. Its ligand SDF-1 appears to modulate in
vitro several aspects of megakaryocytopoiesis. Further studies of cells
of the megakaryocytic lineage, particularly those derived from knock
out mice, should provide novel insights into the physiological
regulation of megakaryocytopoiesis by SDF-1.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Submitted December 17, 1997;
accepted May 13, 1998.
Supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants No. HL
53745-02, HL 43510-07, HL 55187-01, HL 51456-02, and HL 55445-01.
Address reprint requests to Jerome E. Groopman, MD, Division of
Experimental Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard
Institutes of Medicine, 4 Blackfan Circle, Boston, MA 02115; e-mail:
jgroopma{at}west.bidmc.harvard.edu.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" is accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
The authors are grateful to Janet Delahanty for her editing and for the
preparation of the figures for this manuscript and to Nancy DesRosiers
for her assistance with the figures. Finally, we appreciate Youngsun
Jung and Tee Trac for their typing assistance, Stephanie Brubaker and
Delroy Heath for facilitating our receipt of the needed reagents for
the experiments, and Dr In-Woo Park for his scientific suggestions.
 |
REFERENCES |
1.
Rollins BJ:
Chemokines.
Blood
90:909,
1997[Free Full Text]
2.
Premack BA,
Schall TJ:
Chemokine receptors: Gateways to inflammation and infection.
Nat Med
2:1174,
1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Murphy PM:
The molecular biology of leukocyte chemoattractant receptors.
Annu Rev Immunol
12:593,
1994[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Arai H,
Charo IF:
Differential regulation of G-protein-mediated signaling by chemokine receptors.
J Biol Chem
271:21814,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5.
Bokoch GM:
Chemoattractant signaling and leukocyte activation.
Blood
86:1649,
1995[Free Full Text]
6.
Raport CJ,
Gosling J,
Schweickart VL,
Gray PW,
Charo IF:
Molecular cloning and functional characterization of a novel human CC chemokine receptor (CCR5) for RANTES, MIP-1 and MIP-1 .
J Biol Chem
271:17161,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7.
Franci C,
Wong LM,
Van DJ,
Proost P,
Charo IF:
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-3, but not monocyte chemoattractant protein-2, is a functional ligand of the human monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 receptor.
J Immunol
154:6511,
1995[Abstract]
8.
Gao JL,
Kuhns DB,
Tiffany HL,
McDermott D,
Li X,
Francke U,
Murphy PM:
Structure and functional expression of the human macrophage inflammatory protein 1 /RANTES receptor.
J Exp Med
177:1421,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9.
Cerretti DP,
Kozlosky CJ,
Vanden Bos T,
Nelson N,
Gearing DP,
Beckmann MP:
Molecular characterization of receptors for human interleukin-8, GRO/melanoma growth-stimulatory activity and neutrophil activating peptide-2.
Mol Immunol
30:359,
1993[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Bleul CC,
Fuhlbrigge RC,
Casasnovas JM,
Aiuti A,
Springer TA:
A highly efficacious lymphocyte chemoattractant, stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1).
J Exp Med
184:1101,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11.
Loetscher M,
Geiser T,
O'Reilly T,
Zwahlen R,
Baggiolini M,
Moser B:
Cloning of a human seven-transmembrane domain receptor, LESTR, that is highly expressed in leukocytes.
J Biol Chem
269:232,
1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12.
Heesen M,
Berman MA,
Benson JD,
Gerard C,
Dorf ME:
Cloning of the mouse fusin gene, homologue to a human HIV-1 co-factor.
J Immunol
157:5455,
1996[Abstract]
13.
Heesen M,
Berman MA,
Hopken UE,
Gerard NP,
Dorf ME:
Alternate splicing of mouse fusin/CXC chemokine receptor-4: Stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha is a ligand for both CXC chemokine receptor-4 isoforms.
J Immunol
158:3561,
1997[Abstract]
14.
Bleul CC,
Farzan M,
Choe H,
Parolin C,
Clark-Lewis I,
Sodroski J,
Springer TA:
The lymphocyte chemoattractant SDF-1 is a ligand for LESTR/fusin and blocks HIV-1 entry.
Nature
382:829,
1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Feng Y,
Broder CC,
Kennedy PE,
Berger EA:
HIV-1 entry cofactor: Functional cDNA cloning of a seven-transmembrane, G protein-coupled receptor.
Science
272:872,
1996[Abstract]
16.
Kitchen SG,
Zack JA:
CXCR4 expression during lymphopoiesis: Implications for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection of the thymus.
J Virol
71:6928,
1997[Abstract]
17.
D'Apuzzo M,
Rolink A,
Loetscher M,
Hoxie JA,
Clark-Lewis I,
Melchers F,
Baggiolini M,
Moser B:
The chemokine SDF-1, stromal cell-derived factor 1, attracts early stage B cell precursors via the chemokine receptor CXCR4.
Eur J Immunol
27:1788,
1997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Ayehunie S,
Garcia-Zepeda EA,
Hoxie JA,
Horuk R,
Kupper TS,
Luster AD,
Ruprecht RM:
Human immunodeficiency virus-1 entry into purified blood dendritic cells through CC and CXC chemokine coreceptors.
Blood
90:1379,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19.
Sozzani S,
Luini W,
Borsatti A,
Polentarutti N,
Zhou D,
Piemonti L,
D'Amico G,
Power CA,
Wells TN,
Gobbi M,
Allavena P,
Mantovani A:
Receptor expression and responsiveness of human dendritic cells to a defined set of CC and CXC chemokines.
J Immunol
159:1993,
1997[Abstract]
20.
Tashiro K,
Tada H,
Heilker R,
Shirozu M,
Nakano T,
Honjo T:
Signal sequence trap: A cloning strategy for secreted proteins and type I membrane proteins.
Science
261:600,
1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21.
Nagasawa T,
Nakajima T,
Tachibana K,
Iizasa H,
Bleul CC,
Yoshie O,
Matsushima K,
Yoshida N,
Springer TA,
Kishimoto T:
Molecular cloning and characterization of a murine pre-B-cell growth-stimulating factor/stromal cell-derived factor 1 receptor, a murine homolog of the human immunodeficiency virus 1 entry coreceptor fusin.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:14726,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22.
Nagasawa T,
Hirota S,
Tachibana K,
Takakura N,
Nishikawa S,
Kitamura Y,
Yoshida N,
Kikutani H,
Kishimoto T:
Defects of B-cell lymphopoiesis and bone-marrow myelopoiesis in mice lacking the CXC chemokine PBSF/SDF-1.
Nature
382:635,
1996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Aiuti A,
Webb IJ,
Bleul C,
Springer T,
Gutierrez-Ramos JC:
The chemokine SDF-1 is a chemoattractant for human CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells and provides a new mechanism to explain the mobilization of CD34+ progenitors to peripheral blood.
J Exp Med
185:111,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24.
Banu N,
Wang JF,
Deng B,
Groopman JE,
Avraham H:
Modulation of megakaryocytopoiesis by thrombopoietin: The c-Mpl ligand.
Blood
86:1331,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25.
Banu N,
Price DJ,
London R,
Deng B,
Mark M,
Godowski PJ,
Avraham H:
Modulation of megakaryocytopoiesis by human macrophage-stimulating protein, the ligand for the RON receptor.
J Immunol
156:2933,
1996[Abstract]
26.
Raja S,
Avraham S,
Avraham H:
Tyrosine phosphorylation of the novel protein-tyrosine kinase RAFTK during an early phase of platelet activation by an integrin glycoprotein IIb-IIIa-independent mechanism.
J Biol Chem
272:10941,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27.
Zauli G,
Bassini A,
Vitale M,
Gibellini D,
Celeghini C,
Caramelli E,
Pierpaoli S,
Guidotti L,
Capitani S:
Thrombopoietin enhances the alpha IIb beta 3-dependent adhesion of megakaryocytic cells to fibrinogen or fibronectin through PI 3 kinase.
Blood
89:883,
1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28.
Hegyi E,
Nakazawa M,
Debili N,
Navarro S,
Katz A,
Breton-Gorius J,
Vainchenker W:
Developmental changes in human megakaryocyte ploidy.
Exp Hematol
19:87,
1991[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Okumura N,
Tsuji K,
Ebihara Y,
Tanaka I,
Sawai N,
Koike K,
Komiyama A,
Nakahata T:
Chemotactic and chemokinetic activities of stem cell factor on murine hematopoietic progenitor cells.
Blood
87:4100,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30.
Kim CH,
Broxmeyer HE:
In vitro behavior of hematopoietic progenitor cells under the influence of chemoattractants: Stromal cell-derived factor-1, steel factor, and the bone marrow environment.
Blood
91:100,
1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31.
Charbord P,
Tavian M,
Humeau L,
Peault B:
Early ontogeny of the human marrow from long bones: An immunohistochemical study of hematopoiesis and its microenvironment.
Blood
87:4109,
1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32.
Rafii S,
Shapiro F,
Pettengell R,
Ferris B,
Nachman RL,
Moore MA,
Asch AS:
Human bone marrow microvascular endothelial cells support long-term proliferation and differentiation of myeloid and megakaryocytic progenitors.
Blood
86:3353,
1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33.
Avraham H,
Cowley S,
Chi SY,
Jiang S,
Groopm |